<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: SSDs and TrueCrypt: durability and performance issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Von: SSD Disk Encryption (Truecrypt vs Bitlocker vs DiskCryptor) - Seite 12</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-56190</link>
		<dc:creator>SSD Disk Encryption (Truecrypt vs Bitlocker vs DiskCryptor) - Seite 12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-56190</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Jeremy Collake</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-56189</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Collake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-56189</guid>
		<description>The &#039;SSD &amp; Flash Wear Leveling Warning&#039; that you link to is a *security* concern, not a performance or functional concern. The concern is that unencrypted (plaintext) data could be stored on a block not accessible to the Operating System - one reserved instead by the device&#039;s wear leveling mechanism. I am simply clarifying for readers who may misunderstand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;SSD &amp; Flash Wear Leveling Warning&#8217; that you link to is a *security* concern, not a performance or functional concern. The concern is that unencrypted (plaintext) data could be stored on a block not accessible to the Operating System &#8211; one reserved instead by the device&#8217;s wear leveling mechanism. I am simply clarifying for readers who may misunderstand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Media Addicted</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-56170</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Addicted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-56170</guid>
		<description>...just take all of the space available and encrypt it with truecrypt. all i&#039;ve read about that indicates, that it doesn&#039;t matter at all if you decide to use all the space available...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;just take all of the space available and encrypt it with truecrypt. all i&#8217;ve read about that indicates, that it doesn&#8217;t matter at all if you decide to use all the space available&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Media Addicted</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-56144</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Addicted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-56144</guid>
		<description>just use it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just use it <img src='http://media-addicted.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Guest</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-56143</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-56143</guid>
		<description>Ok. I think I understand what you saying. I have a brand new Crucial M4 128GB SSD, never been used, I have it plugged in right now but not done anything with it. So given my scenario, what would you suggest?

Many Thanks.
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok. I think I understand what you saying. I have a brand new Crucial M4 128GB SSD, never been used, I have it plugged in right now but not done anything with it. So given my scenario, what would you suggest?</p>
<p>Many Thanks.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Media Addicted</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-56141</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Addicted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-56141</guid>
		<description>with new drives like intel&#039;s 320 / 510 series, ocz&#039;s vertex 3 etc. this isn&#039;t a problem anymore as manufacturers have increased spare areas to 10-15% of a drive&#039;s capacity. if you stick with some older ones go for sth like 5-10% of drive&#039;s capacity. 

important: you first have to secure erase your SSD, then partition with that additional spare area to make it work. if you simply shrink existing partitions or delete existing ones, the controller won&#039;t use the space as spare area...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with new drives like intel&#8217;s 320 / 510 series, ocz&#8217;s vertex 3 etc. this isn&#8217;t a problem anymore as manufacturers have increased spare areas to 10-15% of a drive&#8217;s capacity. if you stick with some older ones go for sth like 5-10% of drive&#8217;s capacity. </p>
<p>important: you first have to secure erase your SSD, then partition with that additional spare area to make it work. if you simply shrink existing partitions or delete existing ones, the controller won&#8217;t use the space as spare area&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Media Addicted</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-56142</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Addicted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-56142</guid>
		<description>with new drives like intel&#039;s 320 / 510 series, ocz&#039;s vertex 3 etc. this isn&#039;t a problem anymore as manufacturers have increased spare areas to 10-15% of a drive&#039;s capacity. if you stick with some older ones go for sth like 5-10% of drive&#039;s capacity. 

important: you first have to secure erase your SSD, then partition with that additional spare area to make it work. if you simply shrink existing partitions or delete existing ones, the controller won&#039;t use the space as spare area...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with new drives like intel&#8217;s 320 / 510 series, ocz&#8217;s vertex 3 etc. this isn&#8217;t a problem anymore as manufacturers have increased spare areas to 10-15% of a drive&#8217;s capacity. if you stick with some older ones go for sth like 5-10% of drive&#8217;s capacity. </p>
<p>important: you first have to secure erase your SSD, then partition with that additional spare area to make it work. if you simply shrink existing partitions or delete existing ones, the controller won&#8217;t use the space as spare area&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Guest</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-56140</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-56140</guid>
		<description>You say you should leave some unpartitioned space for the controller to use for wear leveling, how much for an 128GB SSD, say 1GB unpartitioned space?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say you should leave some unpartitioned space for the controller to use for wear leveling, how much for an 128GB SSD, say 1GB unpartitioned space?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Azu</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-55251</link>
		<dc:creator>Azu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-55251</guid>
		<description>So this whole article can be condensed to &quot;don&#039;t use security products unless you need security&quot;? Okay...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this whole article can be condensed to &#8220;don&#8217;t use security products unless you need security&#8221;? Okay&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Media Addicted</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-55228</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Addicted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-55228</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Michal, this post is titled &quot;performance and durability&quot;, not security :) BTW: security would be a very interesting topic to cover, unfortunately I&#039;m not competent in this area.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michal, this post is titled &#8220;performance and durability&#8221;, not security <img src='http://media-addicted.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  BTW: security would be a very interesting topic to cover, unfortunately I&#8217;m not competent in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 9/16 queries in 0.022 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 500/502 objects using disk: basic

Served from: media-addicted.de @ 2012-03-15 14:06:12 -->
