<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: SSDs and TrueCrypt: durability and performance issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 14:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Von: Media Addicted</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-56170</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Addicted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-56170</guid>
		<description>...just take all of the space available and encrypt it with truecrypt. all i&#039;ve read about that indicates, that it doesn&#039;t matter at all if you decide to use all the space available...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;just take all of the space available and encrypt it with truecrypt. all i&#8217;ve read about that indicates, that it doesn&#8217;t matter at all if you decide to use all the space available&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Media Addicted</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-56144</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Addicted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-56144</guid>
		<description>just use it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just use it <img src='http://media-addicted.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Guest</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-56143</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-56143</guid>
		<description>Ok. I think I understand what you saying. I have a brand new Crucial M4 128GB SSD, never been used, I have it plugged in right now but not done anything with it. So given my scenario, what would you suggest?

Many Thanks.
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok. I think I understand what you saying. I have a brand new Crucial M4 128GB SSD, never been used, I have it plugged in right now but not done anything with it. So given my scenario, what would you suggest?</p>
<p>Many Thanks.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Media Addicted</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-56141</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Addicted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-56141</guid>
		<description>with new drives like intel&#039;s 320 / 510 series, ocz&#039;s vertex 3 etc. this isn&#039;t a problem anymore as manufacturers have increased spare areas to 10-15% of a drive&#039;s capacity. if you stick with some older ones go for sth like 5-10% of drive&#039;s capacity. 

important: you first have to secure erase your SSD, then partition with that additional spare area to make it work. if you simply shrink existing partitions or delete existing ones, the controller won&#039;t use the space as spare area...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with new drives like intel&#8217;s 320 / 510 series, ocz&#8217;s vertex 3 etc. this isn&#8217;t a problem anymore as manufacturers have increased spare areas to 10-15% of a drive&#8217;s capacity. if you stick with some older ones go for sth like 5-10% of drive&#8217;s capacity. </p>
<p>important: you first have to secure erase your SSD, then partition with that additional spare area to make it work. if you simply shrink existing partitions or delete existing ones, the controller won&#8217;t use the space as spare area&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Media Addicted</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-56142</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Addicted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-56142</guid>
		<description>with new drives like intel&#039;s 320 / 510 series, ocz&#039;s vertex 3 etc. this isn&#039;t a problem anymore as manufacturers have increased spare areas to 10-15% of a drive&#039;s capacity. if you stick with some older ones go for sth like 5-10% of drive&#039;s capacity. 

important: you first have to secure erase your SSD, then partition with that additional spare area to make it work. if you simply shrink existing partitions or delete existing ones, the controller won&#039;t use the space as spare area...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with new drives like intel&#8217;s 320 / 510 series, ocz&#8217;s vertex 3 etc. this isn&#8217;t a problem anymore as manufacturers have increased spare areas to 10-15% of a drive&#8217;s capacity. if you stick with some older ones go for sth like 5-10% of drive&#8217;s capacity. </p>
<p>important: you first have to secure erase your SSD, then partition with that additional spare area to make it work. if you simply shrink existing partitions or delete existing ones, the controller won&#8217;t use the space as spare area&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Guest</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-56140</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-56140</guid>
		<description>You say you should leave some unpartitioned space for the controller to use for wear leveling, how much for an 128GB SSD, say 1GB unpartitioned space?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say you should leave some unpartitioned space for the controller to use for wear leveling, how much for an 128GB SSD, say 1GB unpartitioned space?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Azu</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-55251</link>
		<dc:creator>Azu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-55251</guid>
		<description>So this whole article can be condensed to &quot;don&#039;t use security products unless you need security&quot;? Okay...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this whole article can be condensed to &#8220;don&#8217;t use security products unless you need security&#8221;? Okay&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Media Addicted</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-55228</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Addicted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-55228</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Michal, this post is titled &quot;performance and durability&quot;, not security :) BTW: security would be a very interesting topic to cover, unfortunately I&#039;m not competent in this area.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michal, this post is titled &#8220;performance and durability&#8221;, not security <img src='http://media-addicted.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  BTW: security would be a very interesting topic to cover, unfortunately I&#8217;m not competent in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Michal</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-55224</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 10:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-55224</guid>
		<description>You didn&#039;t mentioned security at all. Security is most important thing of encrypted disks. Trim is potentialy security risk. TrueCrypt first write  random data to the whole drive so nobody could recognize whether the block is empty or not. This is the opposite of trim function. So if you want safety storage you can&#039;t use trim. This is huge problem and I guess there is need to make up whole new way how to encrypt ssd with trim function and no power loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You didn&#8217;t mentioned security at all. Security is most important thing of encrypted disks. Trim is potentialy security risk. TrueCrypt first write  random data to the whole drive so nobody could recognize whether the block is empty or not. This is the opposite of trim function. So if you want safety storage you can&#8217;t use trim. This is huge problem and I guess there is need to make up whole new way how to encrypt ssd with trim function and no power loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Media Addicted</title>
		<link>http://media-addicted.de/ssd-and-truecrypt-durability-and-performance-issues/744/#comment-55221</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Addicted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-addicted.de/?p=744#comment-55221</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Kannst ruhig deutsch schreiben, der Artikel ist nur Englisch, weil so viele englische Leser meine Tekkie-Posts lesen :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nein, bei mir war das kein problem. Ich tippe mal, dass du eine SSD mit SandForce controller hast, die nutzen Garbage collection. Und diese garbage-Informationen müllen den Controller bei Komplettverschlüsselung zu, weil ja das OS gar nicht mitbekommt, welche Sektoren physikalisch beschrieben werden und welche nicht. Irgendwann sagt dann der Controller, dass alles &quot;Garbage&quot; ist und hat keinen Platz mehr für irgend was anderes (für den Controller sieht es ja so aus, als sei die ganze Platte mit Zufallsdaten vollgemüllt) und dann bleibt es eben stehen - denke ich mir jetzt mal so.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kann man GC ggf. deaktivieren?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kannst ruhig deutsch schreiben, der Artikel ist nur Englisch, weil so viele englische Leser meine Tekkie-Posts lesen <img src='http://media-addicted.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Nein, bei mir war das kein problem. Ich tippe mal, dass du eine SSD mit SandForce controller hast, die nutzen Garbage collection. Und diese garbage-Informationen müllen den Controller bei Komplettverschlüsselung zu, weil ja das OS gar nicht mitbekommt, welche Sektoren physikalisch beschrieben werden und welche nicht. Irgendwann sagt dann der Controller, dass alles &#8220;Garbage&#8221; ist und hat keinen Platz mehr für irgend was anderes (für den Controller sieht es ja so aus, als sei die ganze Platte mit Zufallsdaten vollgemüllt) und dann bleibt es eben stehen &#8211; denke ich mir jetzt mal so.</p>
<p>Kann man GC ggf. deaktivieren?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 8/16 queries in 0.053 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 492/493 objects using disk: basic

Served from: media-addicted.de @ 2012-01-05 16:06:39 -->
